Size & Shape. Audix made thier amazing i5 dynamic microphone to make everything from drums to guitar amps to horns sound fantastic. response is optimized for the workhorse applications - drums, miccing speaker cabinets, etc. The SM57 has also been subjected to the Shure Drop test. the i5 is a bit more aggressive in the lower mids and sits well in the mix. The SM57 is designed into a cardioid pickup pattern which helps to ensure the main sound is clear and any background noise is reduced to the barest minimum. I was wondering if anyone has used this mic for vocals? The frequency response for this microphone ranges from 50Hz to 15kHz. Between 1986 and 1989, Audix broke new ground with the OM Series of vocal microphones with VLM™ (Very Low Mass) technology. Which musical instrument would you like to master, if given the chance? When it comes to live miking, your instruments deserve the same attention to detail that your vocals get. It doesn't have as much obvious presence as some dynamic mics I've used, but this makes it easier to achieve the sound you want using moderate amounts of EQ. ? Yeah I would go with the Audix i5. Not tomorrow morning, but eventually. Physically the i5 doesn’t fail but is design is pretty basic. Final Word. You'll find it to be very "flat" sounding for vocals -and slightly nasal b/c that's how it's optimized. A pair of decent condenser mics will usually do the job for overheads. There are different options or varieties of microphones today. Both of these mics are slightly different. The i5 is a dynamic instrument mic - it will "work" for vocals but the freq. The i5 cardioid microphone can be used to microphone a wide variety of musical instruments, guitars and bass cabinets as well as vocals and speech. Between 1986 and 1989, Audix broke new ground with the OM Series of vocal microphones with VLM™ (Very Low Mass) technology. The term "mic technique" is how a singer uses the distance to the mic as they sing to control their volume. The low end of the i5 is punchier than the 57. So, don’t expect the sound to be perfect for a vocal recording. If you're really into recording - you will actually need several mics before you're done. maybe its no longer the merely right possible, even at that funds... yet while there's a extra perfect one for recording and for stay artwork, i don't comprehend roughly it! for a guy, what is the difference between a fantastic chick and just average? What you'd need there is a very sensitive condensor mic . That depends totally on the mic, and the type of singing. Yeah I would go with the Audix i5. You will get a chance to have your hands on it virtually everywhere. It would work to set up a dynamic mic as a "room mic" and just see what you get - but usually the pick-up pattern is way too close to the mic to be useful in that way. When using it, there’s no feedback and its a great choice to use. When tested with a variety of instruments, the i5 performs well on guitars and even percussion instruments. The i5 is able to handle sound pressure levels in excess of 140 dB without distortion and can be used to mic a wide variety of musical instruments, guitar and bass cabinets, vocals and speech. The choice of the mic which you pick will determine the quality of the recording that can be gotten from it. Do these things at rehearsal, so that you know if something works, or not. A lot of people are always looking to ensure that they are able to get great choices. There are more expensive Shure mics now - but trust me - a 58 for vocals and a 57 for utility work and you'll be in great shape. This makes it a great choice for recording loud instruments such as drums. Went to GC and was talked into buying this mic. Make that your utility mic and then buy something else for vocals. The blend of black and gold makes it very appealing. Microphones have been known to be very important for quite some time now. If Audix, an OM5 or OM7 for vocals , depending on the type of music (the 5 requires you to sing tighter to the mic) The i5 is a dynamic instrument mic - it will "work" for vocals but the freq. It is also shorter than a number of other dynamic mics and it makes it easier to position around drums. For recording, doubling it with a condenser has given me some great outcomes - being waiting to combination the unique treble of the condenser with the extra around, heat reaction of the dynamic mic is a stable thank you to get closer to the sound you desire with out having to do as plenty EQ. You can be confident about the durability which it provides and you are free to make use of it anyhow that you would like. Oh, and the i5 actually sounds great on vocals too! However, the Audix i5 compares favorably to it. It’s solid build and reliable performance make this dynamic mic a … If you can multi-track some way, one decent Dynamic mic will work. Saul. The sound produced from such a mic must be clear and the machine must be reliable. There’s a bass pump at 150Hz. It can help to define the sound of instruments for an overall good recording. For the purpose of this article, we’ll be taking a close look at these two microphones and comparing what you stand to gain from the use of both of them. The legendary mic has been used by past celebrities and is quickly becoming a top choice for the new generation. The only real difference is the ball "pop" filter on the 58. However, very few microphones compared to the quality of the Audix i5 and the sm57. - but then you'll also need some mics you can set up for "room mics" - or if you're recording a gig - to mic the crowd and the room as well as the band. Use a pop filter! Only a few microphones can compare with the reputation which the Shure 57 has. Because of my love of recording, I am forced to experiment due to the need to be creative, and this process often begins with mic choice and mic placement; so it s absolutely essential I try different things.